Highlighted: Russia – Manizha

Manizha

Tonight is the night… the first semifinal of the Eurovision Song Contest. 16 countries compete for a place in the grand final, including Russia, with singer Manizha. But who is Manizha?

Manizha (full name Manizja Dalerovna Sangin) was born in 1991 in Dushanbe, the capital of the then Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic, a state of the Soviet Union. Her father was a doctor, her mother a psychologist and couturier. Her parents divorced when Manizha was very young . Her father has always opposed a musical career for his daughter, as he believed it to be contrary to their beliefs. Manizha changed her birth name Chamrajeva to Sangin, in tribute to her grandmother, who was one of the first to encourage Manizha to pursue a musical career. Her grandmother was one of the first women in Tajikistan to remove her veil and start a career of her own; after this her children were taken out of her care, although she was later able to return to them.

In 1994 she fled with her family to the Russian capital Moscow because of the outbreak of the Tajik Civil War. She  also graduated as a psychologist from the Russian State University of Human Sciences. Manizja started her musical career in 2003, at the age of twelve. She took part in talent shows, and was part of “Ru.Kola” (2007-2011), “Assai” (2011) and “Krip de Shin” (2011-2014 / 15) After studying Gospel Music in London and New York, Manizha returned to Russia in 2016, where she started her solo career. In February she released her debut album, “Manuscript”. In 2018 she launched the flash mob “Beauty Trauma” against the beauty ideals imposed by the media. During a concert on the roof of Chateau de Fantomas in Moscow, she took off her make-up and invited her audience to do the same. Manizha supports various charities. In 2019, she launched a campaign against domestic violence, and released the app “Silsila”, which allows victims of domestic violence to quickly seek help. She also released a video clip for the song “Mama” with director Lado Quatania,in which she exposes the problem of domestic violence against women and children.The project came about without the support of the state, outside companies or funds. For that reason, Manizha’s mother took out a mortgage on the apartment.

Manizha also actively supports the LGBTQI+ community. In 2019 she starred in a video for the Russian online queer magazine “Otkritiye”, which earned her a lot of criticism and costed her tenthousands of followers on Social Media.

All in all, an interesting, socially responsible, committed woman. Her entry for the Eurovision Song Contest also exposes a social issue. Or, as she herself explained to Eurovision TV:

“This is a song about the transformation of women’s self-consciousness in Russia over the centuries. A Russian woman has gone a tremendous way from a peasant cabin to the right to be chosen and chosen (one of the first in the world), from factory workshops to space flights. She has never been afraid to resist stereotypes and take responsibility. This is the source of inspiration for the song. ”

Many Russian viewers took offense at a singer of Tajik descent singing about Russian women and the singer’s activism for LGBTQI+ and women’s -rights, and left hate reaction on the video and her Instagram account, demanding that she quit Eurovision. YThe first vice-chair of the State Duma Committee on Culture, suggested banning Manizha from performing in the Eurovision Song Contest under the Russian flag, also noting that Eurovision offered no cultural value and was too politicized and was pro-LGBTQI+.

Still, she will be in the First semifinal of the Eurovision Song Contest tonight, and there is a good chance that she will be able to sing her “Russian Woman” again for Europe during the big Final of the festival.

Good luck Manizha!

In Cooperation with Eurovision Artists.

Photo and video credits: EBU

 

Related news

History

70 years of Eurovision: she won, they won

The Eurovision Song Contest is celebrating its 70th anniversary. That is a wonderful milestone. We at Eurovision Universe love diving into the history of the contest. That is why we are taking a closer look at the contests of the past 70 years. 2023 Because Ukraine could not safely host the Eurovision Song Contest, the United Kingdom stepped in as the runner-up from 2022. Liverpool was chosen as the host city, and the M&S Bank Arena became the stage. Hannah Waddingham, Julia Sanina, Alesha Dixon, and Graham Norton presented the event. The city embraced the occasion wholeheartedly, decorating itself in Ukrainian blue and yellow throughout contest week. It was one of the most warmly received editions in recent memory. The songs Marco Mengoni represented Italy for the second time. He secured a respectable fourth place. Moldova’s contestant was no newcomer either. Pasha Parfeni already participated in 2012. Teya and Salena from Austria wondered: “Who The Hell Is Edgar?” Together with Joëlle Ursull in 1990, they were the second to mention Edgar Allan Poe in their song. Although the two did well with the bookmakers, they still finished in 15th place. The Polish contestant Blanka was controversial. She had been promoted in advance by the Polish broadcaster. And she was said to know the son of jury chairwoman Edyta Górniak quite well. TVP was also accused of homophobia because the favorite Jann received very few points. The Canadian singer La Zarra represented France but failed to live up to expectations. When the televote for France was announced, she put her middle finger on the camera. The Belgian contestant Gustaph repeated what Laura Tesoro did in 2016. No one had confidence in the entry, but from the moment the stage act was revealed, Gustaph’s odds rose. Ultimately, he exceeded all expectations with a seventh-place finish. Striking, but unpopular with the jury, was Let 3 from Croatia. Featuring, among other things, a pink version of a German army uniform, Let 3’s act looked more like a fever dream. As mentioned, the jury did not appreciate it, but the televoters did. Mae Muller represented the host country, the United Kingdom. During all the rehearsals, she sang so terribly badly that the men feared the worst. And although the singing was better during the broadcast, a 25th place was the best she could achieve. Käärijä, crowd favorite Both the people in the audience and the televoters at home had a clear preference for the Finn Käärijä. With a unique act, charisma, and a neon-green bolero, he managed to capture everyone’s full attention. He therefore won comfortably with the televoter with his “Cha-Cha-Cha”. The jury was slightly less charmed by it, which resulted in a result deemed unnecessary by the audience. The entire hall chanted “Käärijä! Käärijä! Käärijä!”. Loreen In the end, the professional jury vote was decisive. Loreen won convincingly among the national juries, while Käärijä took the public televote by storm. When the final scores were combined, Loreen came out ahead. She became the second artist in Eurovision history to win the contest twice, the first being Johnny Logan of Ireland, who won in 1980 and 1987. Sweden claimed its seventh Eurovision title. The result was controversial among fans, many of whom felt Käärijä deserved the victory. The debate about the balance between jury and public vote flared up again with renewed intensity. Regardless, Loreen’s vocal performance on the night was flawless, and “Tattoo” became one of the most-streamed Eurovision winners in the contest’s history. 2024 Sweden hosted for the seventh time. The Malmö Arena welcomed the contest, and (of course) Petra Mede and Malin Åkerman presented the event. Malmö had hosted before, in 1992 and 2013. The contest, however, took place in a charged political atmosphere. Israel’s participation was the subject of intense debate, given the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Protests took place outside the arena throughout the week. Inside, the contest carried on. Several calls to exclude Israel were made by broadcasters and artists alike. The EBU held firm: Israel would participate. Eden Golan represented the country with “Hurricane,” a song whose original lyrics had been altered at the EBU’s request. Despite, or perhaps because of, the controversy, Golan finished fifth. Romania withdrew from the contest. On the other hand, there was also good news: Luxembourg returned to Eurovision for the first time since 1993.  The songs Hera Björk from Iceland participated for the second time. However, the success she achieved in 2010 was not present this time. Natalia Barbu from Moldova also failed to reach the final. Fortunately, the rule that applied to her in 2007 (if you do not reach the final, you pay the costs yourself) was not in effect this time. Alyona Alyona and Jerry Heil represented Ukraine. The latter had already participated in the national final several times. The entry impressed so much that Ukraine could count on a third place. Although Spain did not finish very high, the entry, “Zorra”, was hugely popular. Ireland came with the first non-binary participant, Bambie Thug. They performed their entry “Doomsday Blues” in a very unique way: seated in a sort of witches’ circle, Bambie Thug defeated their demons. The act was very popular with some, while others found it too scary for a family program. Bambie Thug finished sixth. Olly Alexander represented the United Kingdom. His act took place in a somewhat dingy dressing room. The entry was not a success. Windows95man finished low in the final. During the national final, he was wearing a shirt with the Windows 95 logo. This had to be blurred during the live broadcast. The French entry was very popular. Singer Slimane was certainly not qutie unknown in his own country either. His song “Mon Amour” ultimately finished fourth. The Croatian Baby Lasagna was very popular and was even seen as a potential winner. His song about leaving home and hearth resonated with the audience. Joost Klein “Europapa”, the Dutch entry by Joost Klein, did the same. He participated in the festival

Read More »
History
Martijn

70 years of Eurovision: she won, they won

The Eurovision Song Contest is celebrating its 70th anniversary. That is a wonderful milestone. We at Eurovision Universe love diving into the history of the contest. That is why we are taking a closer look at the contests of the past 70 years. 2023 Because Ukraine could not safely host the Eurovision Song Contest, the United Kingdom stepped in as the runner-up from 2022. Liverpool was chosen as the host city, and the M&S Bank Arena became the stage. Hannah Waddingham, Julia Sanina, Alesha Dixon, and Graham Norton presented the event. The city embraced the occasion wholeheartedly, decorating itself in Ukrainian blue and yellow throughout contest week. It was one of the most warmly received editions in recent memory. The songs Marco Mengoni represented Italy for the second time. He secured a respectable fourth place. Moldova’s contestant was no newcomer either. Pasha Parfeni already participated in 2012. Teya and Salena from Austria wondered: “Who The Hell Is Edgar?” Together with Joëlle Ursull in 1990, they were the second to mention Edgar Allan Poe in their song. Although the two did well with the bookmakers, they still finished in 15th place. The Polish contestant Blanka was controversial. She had been promoted in advance by the Polish broadcaster. And she was said to know the son of jury chairwoman Edyta Górniak quite well. TVP was also accused of homophobia because the favorite Jann received very few points. The Canadian singer La Zarra represented France but failed to live up to expectations. When the televote for France was announced, she put her middle finger on the camera. The Belgian contestant Gustaph repeated what Laura Tesoro did in 2016. No one had confidence in the entry, but from the moment the stage act was revealed, Gustaph’s odds rose. Ultimately, he exceeded all expectations with a seventh-place finish. Striking, but unpopular with the jury, was Let 3 from Croatia. Featuring, among other things, a pink version of a German army uniform, Let 3’s act looked more like a fever dream. As mentioned, the jury did not appreciate it, but the televoters did. Mae Muller represented the host country, the United Kingdom. During all the rehearsals, she sang so terribly badly that the men feared the worst. And although the singing was better during the broadcast, a 25th place was the best she could achieve. Käärijä, crowd favorite Both the people in the audience and the televoters at home had a clear preference for the Finn Käärijä. With a unique act, charisma, and a neon-green bolero, he managed to capture everyone’s full attention. He therefore won comfortably with the televoter with his “Cha-Cha-Cha”. The jury was slightly less charmed by it, which resulted in a result deemed unnecessary by the audience. The entire hall chanted “Käärijä! Käärijä! Käärijä!”. Loreen In the end, the professional jury vote was decisive. Loreen won convincingly among the national juries, while Käärijä took the public televote by storm. When the final scores were combined, Loreen came out ahead. She became the second artist in Eurovision history to win the contest twice, the first being Johnny Logan of Ireland, who won in 1980 and 1987. Sweden claimed its seventh Eurovision title. The result was controversial among fans, many of whom felt Käärijä deserved the victory. The debate about the balance between jury and public vote flared up again with renewed intensity. Regardless, Loreen’s vocal performance on the night was flawless, and “Tattoo” became one of the most-streamed Eurovision winners in the contest’s history. 2024 Sweden hosted for the seventh time. The Malmö Arena welcomed the contest, and (of course) Petra Mede and Malin Åkerman presented the event. Malmö had hosted before, in 1992 and 2013. The contest, however, took place in a charged political atmosphere. Israel’s participation was the subject of intense debate, given the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Protests took place outside the arena throughout the week. Inside, the contest carried on. Several calls to exclude Israel were made by broadcasters and artists alike. The EBU held firm: Israel would participate. Eden Golan represented the country with “Hurricane,” a song whose original lyrics had been altered at the EBU’s request. Despite, or perhaps because of, the controversy, Golan finished fifth. Romania withdrew from the contest. On the other hand, there was also good news: Luxembourg returned to Eurovision for the first time since 1993.  The songs Hera Björk from Iceland participated for the second time. However, the success she achieved in 2010 was not present this time. Natalia Barbu from Moldova also failed to reach the final. Fortunately, the rule that applied to her in 2007 (if you do not reach the final, you pay the costs yourself) was not in effect this time. Alyona Alyona and Jerry Heil represented Ukraine. The latter had already participated in the national final several times. The entry impressed so much that Ukraine could count on a third place. Although Spain did not finish very high, the entry, “Zorra”, was hugely popular. Ireland came with the first non-binary participant, Bambie Thug. They performed their entry “Doomsday Blues” in a very unique way: seated in a sort of witches’ circle, Bambie Thug defeated their demons. The act was very popular with some, while others found it too scary for a family program. Bambie Thug finished sixth. Olly Alexander represented the United Kingdom. His act took place in a somewhat dingy dressing room. The entry was not a success. Windows95man finished low in the final. During the national final, he was wearing a shirt with the Windows 95 logo. This had to be blurred during the live broadcast. The French entry was very popular. Singer Slimane was certainly not qutie unknown in his own country either. His song “Mon Amour” ultimately finished fourth. The Croatian Baby Lasagna was very popular and was even seen as a potential winner. His song about leaving home and hearth resonated with the audience. Joost Klein “Europapa”, the Dutch entry by Joost Klein, did the same. He participated in the festival

Read More »
Follow Us: