UEFA 2020: day 4

Again, three matches will be played today. We start with the first one: Scotland versus Czech Republic. Both countries once sent a song or a singer with a touch of their national identity. In 1966, Kenneth McKellar appeared on stage for the United Kingdom. He sang his song “A man without love” in a Scottish based costume. It was in 2009 that the group Gipsy.cz sang “Aven Romale”. Not the cloths but the music had something of the gipsy identity. By the way, both songs did not really do well.

Poland and Slovakia play the second match of the day. Poland had slightly more succes than Slovakia did. But both once sent a ballad that did not score very well, but is very popular among Eurovision fans. Both are 90s songs. In 1995 Justyna Steczkowska represented Poland with the song “Sama”, which means “Alone”. The song seems to be sung a-tonal. It was Katarina Hasprová who sang “Molita” (prayer) in 1998 for Slovakia.

The last match will be between Spain and Sweden. What do you think of boybands? Both countries sent one or more. Do you remember D’Nash, who represented Spain in 2007 with “I love you, mi vida”? Or do you remember Arvingarna? They took part in this years Swedish Melodifestivalen, but in 1993 they represented Sweden with the song “Eloise”.

Related news

Eurovision 2026

EBU warning Israel after voting campaign

📷EBU/Corinne Cumming The EBU warning to Israel concerns broadcaster KAN and its promotion of “Michelle” by Noam Bettan. The song is Israel’s Eurovision 2026 entry. The warning followed promotional videos in which viewers were urged to use all ten votes for Israel. Eurovision director Martin Green said the EBU contacted the delegation soon after the videos appeared. The campaign was then removed from the relevant platforms. According to the EBU, such a direct voting appeal does not fit the contest rules. It also goes against the spirit of fair competition. KAN said the campaign was the artist’s own initiative. The broadcaster also denied that illegal funding was involved. Rule changes after Israel debate The EBU warning to Israel is notable because it comes in the first year under stricter Eurovision rules. These changes followed the debate after Eurovision 2025. That year, Israel’s Yuval Raphael finished second overall and won the public vote. Several broadcasters and commentators then raised questions about promotion, voting transparency and organised support. As a result, the EBU changed parts of the voting system. The maximum number of votes per payment method was reduced from 20 to 10. Professional juries also returned to the semi-finals. In addition, the EBU tightened its rules on disproportionate promotion. This is especially relevant when governments or third parties are involved. Israel’s Eurovision entries have also faced repeated scrutiny over lyrics. In 2024, Eden Golan’s original song “October Rain” was rejected by the EBU. The lyrics were seen as too political for the contest. A second version, “Dance Forever”, was also not accepted in its first form. Israel eventually competed with the revised song “Hurricane”. This year, Israel’s 2026 entry was approved only after extra checks and reported minor changes. Taken together, the warning, the rule changes and the lyric interventions show a clear pattern. Israel remains part of Eurovision, and KAN denies deliberate rule-breaking. Still, Israel again seems to test how far the rules go. Time after time, the country appears to search for the edges of what is allowed.           

Read More »
Eurovision 2026
Martijn

EBU warning Israel after voting campaign

📷EBU/Corinne Cumming The EBU warning to Israel concerns broadcaster KAN and its promotion of “Michelle” by Noam Bettan. The song is Israel’s Eurovision 2026 entry. The warning followed promotional videos in which viewers were urged to use all ten votes for Israel. Eurovision director Martin Green said the EBU contacted the delegation soon after the videos appeared. The campaign was then removed from the relevant platforms. According to the EBU, such a direct voting appeal does not fit the contest rules. It also goes against the spirit of fair competition. KAN said the campaign was the artist’s own initiative. The broadcaster also denied that illegal funding was involved. Rule changes after Israel debate The EBU warning to Israel is notable because it comes in the first year under stricter Eurovision rules. These changes followed the debate after Eurovision 2025. That year, Israel’s Yuval Raphael finished second overall and won the public vote. Several broadcasters and commentators then raised questions about promotion, voting transparency and organised support. As a result, the EBU changed parts of the voting system. The maximum number of votes per payment method was reduced from 20 to 10. Professional juries also returned to the semi-finals. In addition, the EBU tightened its rules on disproportionate promotion. This is especially relevant when governments or third parties are involved. Israel’s Eurovision entries have also faced repeated scrutiny over lyrics. In 2024, Eden Golan’s original song “October Rain” was rejected by the EBU. The lyrics were seen as too political for the contest. A second version, “Dance Forever”, was also not accepted in its first form. Israel eventually competed with the revised song “Hurricane”. This year, Israel’s 2026 entry was approved only after extra checks and reported minor changes. Taken together, the warning, the rule changes and the lyric interventions show a clear pattern. Israel remains part of Eurovision, and KAN denies deliberate rule-breaking. Still, Israel again seems to test how far the rules go. Time after time, the country appears to search for the edges of what is allowed.           

Read More »
Follow Us: