Sietse Bakker optimistic about Eurovision 2021

Of course the logo of the 2021 Eurovision Song Contest caused a lot of reactions, positive as well as negative. Sietse Bakker, executive producer of the Eurovision Song Contest 2021, responded on those comments on his facebook page:

“When we started thinking about our artwork we quickly realised we didn’t want to abandon the style, while has great potential for TV. But we did want to ingest new energy into it, and encourage those who love the Eurovision Song Contest to look forward with hope and anticipation. The renewed logo symbolises the connecting power of the Contest and it shows that we are open to everything these 41 countries have to offer.”

He also looks forward to how the contest will be organized. And yes, he ís optimistic:

“The story will continue next year, no matter what and we hope to welcome the participants, press and fans to Rotterdam in May; physical if possible, virtual if necessary. Thanks to developments regarding vaccines and reliable rapid tests, we are now cautiously optimistic about what can be done responsibly in May. And all of Europe is now watching us. With creativity and decisiveness, inspired by that typical Rotterdam resilience, we are going to make something very special out of it, I am convinced of that!”

 

Related news

Uncategorized

Israel Eurovision 2025 Participation Sparks Boycott

Israel Eurovision 2025 Participation Sparks Boycott Israel’s participation in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 has ignited a major controversy. After organizers decided to allow Israel to remain in the competition, four countries, the Netherlands, Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia, announced their withdrawal from Eurovision 2026 in protest. This rare Eurovision boycott has turned the contest into a political flashpoint. Background: Israel in Eurovision 2025 Israel finished second at Eurovision 2025, a strong result driven by public votes. However, several countries complained that Israel had artificially boosted its tally through a broad advertising campaign urging Europeans to vote for its entry. The dispute unfolded amid the Gaza war, pushing the ostensibly apolitical contest into an uncomfortable spotlight. In response, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) rolled out new measures to protect Eurovision’s neutrality. Government-led promotion campaigns were discouraged under the updated rules. In early December, EBU members reviewed these changes and decided not to hold a vote on Israel’s status. With this, they effectively confirmed Israel would remain in Eurovision 2026. Four Countries Withdraw in Protest Following the EBU decision to keep Israel in the contest, four national broadcasters promptly confirmed their withdrawal from Eurovision 2026. Ireland’s RTÉ deemed participation “unconscionable” amid Gaza’s civilian death toll. Spain’s RTVE and the Netherlands’ AVROTROS also pulled out after the Geneva vote, arguing that taking part was incompatible with their public service values. Slovenia likewise confirmed it would boycott the contest, as it had vowed if Israel stayed. Impact and Reactions The boycott is especially significant because it includes Spain. The country is one of Eurovision’s “Big Five” nations that provide major funding and automatic finalist spots. Organizers warn that losing multiple major countries could dent the show’s global audience (typically around 150 million viewers) and deter sponsors. Israeli officials, meanwhile, welcomed the EBU’s decision. President Isaac Herzog said Israel “deserves to be represented on every stage around the world”. This saga presents Eurovision with an unprecedented challenge: upholding its spirit of musical unity in the face of deep geopolitical divides.

Read More »
Uncategorized
Martijn

Israel Eurovision 2025 Participation Sparks Boycott

Israel Eurovision 2025 Participation Sparks Boycott Israel’s participation in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 has ignited a major controversy. After organizers decided to allow Israel to remain in the competition, four countries, the Netherlands, Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia, announced their withdrawal from Eurovision 2026 in protest. This rare Eurovision boycott has turned the contest into a political flashpoint. Background: Israel in Eurovision 2025 Israel finished second at Eurovision 2025, a strong result driven by public votes. However, several countries complained that Israel had artificially boosted its tally through a broad advertising campaign urging Europeans to vote for its entry. The dispute unfolded amid the Gaza war, pushing the ostensibly apolitical contest into an uncomfortable spotlight. In response, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) rolled out new measures to protect Eurovision’s neutrality. Government-led promotion campaigns were discouraged under the updated rules. In early December, EBU members reviewed these changes and decided not to hold a vote on Israel’s status. With this, they effectively confirmed Israel would remain in Eurovision 2026. Four Countries Withdraw in Protest Following the EBU decision to keep Israel in the contest, four national broadcasters promptly confirmed their withdrawal from Eurovision 2026. Ireland’s RTÉ deemed participation “unconscionable” amid Gaza’s civilian death toll. Spain’s RTVE and the Netherlands’ AVROTROS also pulled out after the Geneva vote, arguing that taking part was incompatible with their public service values. Slovenia likewise confirmed it would boycott the contest, as it had vowed if Israel stayed. Impact and Reactions The boycott is especially significant because it includes Spain. The country is one of Eurovision’s “Big Five” nations that provide major funding and automatic finalist spots. Organizers warn that losing multiple major countries could dent the show’s global audience (typically around 150 million viewers) and deter sponsors. Israeli officials, meanwhile, welcomed the EBU’s decision. President Isaac Herzog said Israel “deserves to be represented on every stage around the world”. This saga presents Eurovision with an unprecedented challenge: upholding its spirit of musical unity in the face of deep geopolitical divides.

Read More »
Follow Us: