EBU intends to honour 2020 songs

A few days after the cancellation of the Eurovision Song Contest, the EBU (European Broadcasting Union) brought out a new statement regarding the 2020 Eurovision Song Contest and it’s entries:

We have been overwhelmed with the love that the Eurovision Song Contest family has shared since the difficult decision to cancel the 2020 event.

The EBU is very aware of how much the Eurovision Song Contest will be missed this year. The Contest’s values of universality and inclusivity, and our proud tradition of celebrating diversity through music, are needed now more than ever.

As such, the EBU and its Members are currently exploring alternative programming, but not a competition, to help unite and entertain audiences around Europe during these challenging times.

It is our intention with this programming, and on our online platforms in the coming months, to honour the songs and artists which have been chosen for the Eurovision Song Contest 2020.

With that in mind, the Reference Group, the Song Contest’s governing board, has decided that, in accordance with the rules of the Eurovision Song Contest, this year’s songs will not be eligible to compete when the Contest returns in 2021.

At their discretion, Participating Broadcasters may decide which artist(s) to send in 2021, either this year’s representative or a new one.

We ask for your continued patience while we work throught practical implications of these ideas in the coming days and weeks.

 

Related news

Eurovision 2026

EBU warning Israel after voting campaign

📷EBU/Corinne Cumming The EBU warning to Israel concerns broadcaster KAN and its promotion of “Michelle” by Noam Bettan. The song is Israel’s Eurovision 2026 entry. The warning followed promotional videos in which viewers were urged to use all ten votes for Israel. Eurovision director Martin Green said the EBU contacted the delegation soon after the videos appeared. The campaign was then removed from the relevant platforms. According to the EBU, such a direct voting appeal does not fit the contest rules. It also goes against the spirit of fair competition. KAN said the campaign was the artist’s own initiative. The broadcaster also denied that illegal funding was involved. Rule changes after Israel debate The EBU warning to Israel is notable because it comes in the first year under stricter Eurovision rules. These changes followed the debate after Eurovision 2025. That year, Israel’s Yuval Raphael finished second overall and won the public vote. Several broadcasters and commentators then raised questions about promotion, voting transparency and organised support. As a result, the EBU changed parts of the voting system. The maximum number of votes per payment method was reduced from 20 to 10. Professional juries also returned to the semi-finals. In addition, the EBU tightened its rules on disproportionate promotion. This is especially relevant when governments or third parties are involved. Israel’s Eurovision entries have also faced repeated scrutiny over lyrics. In 2024, Eden Golan’s original song “October Rain” was rejected by the EBU. The lyrics were seen as too political for the contest. A second version, “Dance Forever”, was also not accepted in its first form. Israel eventually competed with the revised song “Hurricane”. This year, Israel’s 2026 entry was approved only after extra checks and reported minor changes. Taken together, the warning, the rule changes and the lyric interventions show a clear pattern. Israel remains part of Eurovision, and KAN denies deliberate rule-breaking. Still, Israel again seems to test how far the rules go. Time after time, the country appears to search for the edges of what is allowed.           

Read More »
Eurovision 2026
Martijn

EBU warning Israel after voting campaign

📷EBU/Corinne Cumming The EBU warning to Israel concerns broadcaster KAN and its promotion of “Michelle” by Noam Bettan. The song is Israel’s Eurovision 2026 entry. The warning followed promotional videos in which viewers were urged to use all ten votes for Israel. Eurovision director Martin Green said the EBU contacted the delegation soon after the videos appeared. The campaign was then removed from the relevant platforms. According to the EBU, such a direct voting appeal does not fit the contest rules. It also goes against the spirit of fair competition. KAN said the campaign was the artist’s own initiative. The broadcaster also denied that illegal funding was involved. Rule changes after Israel debate The EBU warning to Israel is notable because it comes in the first year under stricter Eurovision rules. These changes followed the debate after Eurovision 2025. That year, Israel’s Yuval Raphael finished second overall and won the public vote. Several broadcasters and commentators then raised questions about promotion, voting transparency and organised support. As a result, the EBU changed parts of the voting system. The maximum number of votes per payment method was reduced from 20 to 10. Professional juries also returned to the semi-finals. In addition, the EBU tightened its rules on disproportionate promotion. This is especially relevant when governments or third parties are involved. Israel’s Eurovision entries have also faced repeated scrutiny over lyrics. In 2024, Eden Golan’s original song “October Rain” was rejected by the EBU. The lyrics were seen as too political for the contest. A second version, “Dance Forever”, was also not accepted in its first form. Israel eventually competed with the revised song “Hurricane”. This year, Israel’s 2026 entry was approved only after extra checks and reported minor changes. Taken together, the warning, the rule changes and the lyric interventions show a clear pattern. Israel remains part of Eurovision, and KAN denies deliberate rule-breaking. Still, Israel again seems to test how far the rules go. Time after time, the country appears to search for the edges of what is allowed.           

Read More »
Follow Us: